Our Shimmering Lady of Unerring Purpose ([personal profile] shimmershimmer) wrote in [community profile] warmwood2014-12-02 06:28 am
Entry tags:

Day 01 Trial

[Afternoon is here, and the time has come. We must gather at the temple to enact our solemn duty. There are tears in the Shimmering Lady's eyes as she addresses the group.]

This is something we must do together. Please discuss among yourselves who you believe to be a Demon. Each villager has one vote, and when the trial is over, I'd like you all to close your eyes and concentrate on your choice. If you are not certain, then you may select "no one." But if someone is chosen...

I shall take it from there.

((Vote here! You have 24 hours. More details on the voting page.))
lifescratched: (pic#5418051)

[personal profile] lifescratched 2014-12-02 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Yet we cannot know for certain if they are Soulmates. My father and I were not.
thefaceofjustice: (Do you like my sunglasses?)

[personal profile] thefaceofjustice 2014-12-02 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
But it is a real possibility. We can't be certain that they're innocent if their defense doesn't hold up!

What do you think the Archdemon is going to do with their unique ability? It means nothing if the Seers don't investigate them. So they're likely going to try to get the Seers to focus on them and gain their confidence!
ill_hearted_gentleman: (The old one kind of was.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Please allow me to interject. I feel no need to hide it: Bulat and I are joined by more than just the bonds of marriage. But I believe you have mistaken my reasoning in asking the Seers to investigate us. I have no interest in verifying an innocence I already believe is clear; instead I wish to ease the burden of the Seers by giving them a way to know how to interpret their visions without risking any innocent lives.
fauxlosophical: (PIQUE ☉ and what have we here?)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
And as one of the Seers in question, allow me to ask you this -

Presumably one of us will come back with a vision of you being guilty; the other will perceive you as innocent.

What is preventing you from claiming the one seeing you as innocent is the genuine Seer, regardless of whether you are or not?
ill_hearted_gentleman: (And I guess this new set isn't.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The one who sees us as innocent should be the one with sincere visions, there is nothing to prevent. The only way it would be otherwise is if we are Sinners, and while I do not like that chance, it is still much better odds than relying on your single dream.
fauxlosophical: (CERTAIN ☉ i didn't survive for nothing)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
You're misunderstanding me.

Demons would claim the one to perceive them as innocent is genuine, whether they are or not.
Edited (wow clarification would be cool) 2014-12-02 15:13 (UTC)
ill_hearted_gentleman: (In the keywords I mean.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I misunderstand nothing. I do not acknowledge the possibility that we could be demons, because I know that possibility does not exist. Whether you trust that fact or not, the truth is simply that we are innocent.
fauxlosophical: (PIQUE ☉ and what have we here?)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
...This would be why I didn't seek you out earlier, you know.
ill_hearted_gentleman: (I have a STANDARD to uphold.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, you favor blood over trust, you've made that much clear already.
fauxlosophical: (CERTAIN ☉ i didn't survive for nothing)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
One tends to lead to another, in my experience.
ill_hearted_gentleman: (They're so hard.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Then do you distrust even your own partner? He did not seem terribly surprised by your revelation.
fauxlosophical: (ASSURED ☉ game over motherfucker)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I think he trusts me.

There's a difference.
ill_hearted_gentleman: (The icons aren't supposed to be stupid.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)
And used to your behavior as well, I'd imagine.

Though it does surprise me you wouldn't choose him to dream of first.
fauxlosophical: (GOAD ☉ go on and keep that up)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-02 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
There are others here that I distrust more than him.
thefaceofjustice: (JUSTICE PUNCH)

[personal profile] thefaceofjustice 2014-12-02 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm questioning your repeated interpretation of The Lady's word to suit your own validation and gain the trust of the Seers!

Maybe The Lady will clarify her words for us, but even if she decides not to respond, I still don't believe that simply being on the night watch protected you from possession as you keep claiming it did.

You should know that if you and Mr. Bulat happened to be the Archdemon, it would be an all-too-easy trap to lay out.
ill_hearted_gentleman: (In the keywords I mean.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
...If we are possessed by the Archdemon, then the end result is the same, and the Seers being confirmed is only a disadvantage to the demons as a whole. If you must argue such a point, please at least claim we are regular demons trying to pass ourselves off as Sinners.
thefaceofjustice: (Do you like my sunglasses?)

[personal profile] thefaceofjustice 2014-12-02 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
It sounds like the only way the Seers are getting an unquestionable confirmation is if someone they investigated is lost, or if one of the Seers is lost. ...Unless the Prophet asks a really specific question out in the open.
ill_hearted_gentleman: (I have a STANDARD to uphold.)

[personal profile] ill_hearted_gentleman 2014-12-02 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Eventually we will have to take a risk and execute one of the accused, likely as early as tomorrow. I am simply trying to increase our chances of choosing the correct one.
lifescratched: (pic#6243259)

[personal profile] lifescratched 2014-12-02 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Then how can we trust the word of the Seers at all, if there are so many factors that call what they see into question? Getting enough information to find even the first demon could take days...
thefaceofjustice: (JUSTICE PUNCH)

[personal profile] thefaceofjustice 2014-12-02 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Because the Seers can give us the best chance at justice that we have, once they know what their visions mean! Without them, the demons have an advantage. They know which side everyone is on, and everyone else is in the dark.

...Although after speaking to Mr. Kimblee, I really doubt that he's one of the Seers!
lasuaspada: (ARROGANCE ♞ mhmm sure she did)

[personal profile] lasuaspada 2014-12-02 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
...While I agree with you on that last point, amore, your repeated insisting really isn't doing you any favors.
thefaceofjustice: (Do you like my sunglasses?)

[personal profile] thefaceofjustice 2014-12-02 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
[Okay, valid point. Prosecutor Godot is probably standing right behind him ready to dump coffee on his head.]

...All right.
lasuaspada: (DISMISS ♞ oh - that was your girl?)

[personal profile] lasuaspada 2014-12-02 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't get me wrong, however. I do agree with you.

[It's more a case of now not being the time.]