Our Shimmering Lady of Unerring Purpose ([personal profile] shimmershimmer) wrote in [community profile] warmwood2014-12-02 06:28 am
Entry tags:

Day 01 Trial

[Afternoon is here, and the time has come. We must gather at the temple to enact our solemn duty. There are tears in the Shimmering Lady's eyes as she addresses the group.]

This is something we must do together. Please discuss among yourselves who you believe to be a Demon. Each villager has one vote, and when the trial is over, I'd like you all to close your eyes and concentrate on your choice. If you are not certain, then you may select "no one." But if someone is chosen...

I shall take it from there.

((Vote here! You have 24 hours. More details on the voting page.))
fauxlosophical: (ASSURED ☉ game over motherfucker)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
You've raised an interesting point just now - exactly how close to this partner of yours are you? Your motive in arguing this is the most questionable of all right now, you know.

So tell me. Would the demons be down one member if we destroy him, or would they be down two?
backdrafted: (Cry Wolf)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Close enough to not gladly throw him to the dogs. And I am faithful enough to not murder one of Her followers so easily.
fauxlosophical: (ASSURED ☉ game over motherfucker)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
And yet apparently too close to understand that leaving such a creature alive threatens us all. I would hardly go so far as to call eliminating one of them "murder."
backdrafted: (Bullshit! Be a fucking person!)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I have absolutely no reason to doubt him based on a scrap of paper. I intend to protect the people here, not just kill innocents just to narrow things down. Doesn't that leave us shredded in the end anyway?

I'm not even suggesting that we may be down a demon in choosing you, whether you're possessed or not, am I? You've been permitted here, and so you deserve the chance to be left in peace.
fauxlosophical: (GOAD ☉ go on and keep that up)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
You won't suggest it in any way but implication - that was graceful, by the way, if a bit indiscreet - because it would be an insult to both your intelligence and mine to do so at this point. Neither my faith nor my motives have reason to be questioned; the same can't be said for either of you.
backdrafted: (You know "The stripper myth.")

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah? You're awfully eager to get what kills you can in. Though that may just be your temperament.
fauxlosophical: (PIQUE ☉ and what have we here?)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
My methods may be a little unorthodox, but I know what I'm doing, Mustang. Believe me, this has nothing to do with getting what kills I can in.
backdrafted: (Undercurrent discussion.)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
That has yet to be proven.

But, as I'm saying in regards to Ling's innocence, that has no basis, and shouldn't be acted on without more. And at the very least, more guarantee it will even help us in some way.
fauxlosophical: (CERTAIN ☉ i didn't survive for nothing)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
It has basis in that someone saw it last night. That fact can't be denied.
backdrafted: (Straighten up.)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
There's still the possibility that our demons are clever enough to fake being a Seer, and both the real and false Seers have said nothing. Though I admit chances are slim, they're much higher from now on.
fauxlosophical: (PIQUE ☉ and what have we here?)

[personal profile] fauxlosophical 2014-12-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
You're completely disregarding an obvious possibility, you know.
backdrafted: (Every junkie did soda first.)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
That it's a real seer, Ling is a demon, and it will be very obvious upon his death that he was one? It's already been posted, I don't see a reason to repeat it.
backdrafted: (EXCOOS)

[personal profile] backdrafted 2014-12-01 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
[WELL OKAY!!]